Why so much miss-management from these financial experts? Is it due to adding law to grace is sufficient? - miss management
Leaders of Enron,
Executives of Lehman Brothers
Leaders of Bear Stearns,
WorldCom executives
AIG executives
Executives from Merrill Lynch,
Heads of State and Government of Washington Mutual
Countrywide Financial Leaders
General Motors executives
Alan Greenspan
George W. Bush
U.S. banks
... so that each inffected Add Reverse
Could Addversely under the Law of grace is sufficient?
"As if adding DIS ease, comfort, approval, etc.?
Thursday, January 7, 2010
Miss Management Why So Much Miss-management From These Financial Experts? Is It Due To Adding Law To Grace Is Sufficient?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Please write your question in a coherent framework
It began in the Clinton administration when it was published and the right to a trial, people will be ignored for more housing at the moment, are not eligible. Bush and McCain warned against, but they keep fighting the Black Caucus and Barney Frank is, nothing happens.
Even people who could not afford a home, and Fanny and Freddy were bursting at the scenes with the bad loans that were sold in the financial world.
Bang.
The allegory, I can say exactly why. Because people are shallow, that most thinkers of the faith and confidence in the leadership elections in the training of intelligence, communication skills and experience, without people, the integrity of a glance. You want a perfect example of this? Look at Sarah Palin. Films of the Hollywood stars of the woman dragged through the mud. Says he is not educated, she speaks well, is not known. People are flatter, including the so-called education and who's who of Hollywood. What is a person who possesses all the features of these calls if their motives are bad? It is not good in my opinion.
I think the problem is believed to be that all these people "experts" in a sense that the problems in our human systems and finance companies affiliated terrible Cyrano by our system, trained in the company have more rights than men and are legally responsible only for to maximize profits for shareholders, while the shareholders are not liable for the debt of companies in the exercise of those profits involved.
World can not survive if this credit stringent regulations are not confirmed
both sides of the fence lenders and borrowers.
Post a Comment